Even Taggers Draw the Line Somewhere
There's a plan underfoot in East Los Angeles to set aside areas where grafitti is encouraged. It won't work. Art doesn't exist exclusive of the circumstances that nurtured it. Take away the outlaw nature of grafitti and it's no longer the genuine article. It's ironic that people decry the contemporary art world, with its pompous mission statements, artificially inflated prices, and marketplace chicanery, and in the next breath denounce the freedom of grafitti, which for all its crude technique, limited content, and stylistic sameness is some of the only art being produced nowadays with passion, energy, and pure fun. There's also something in-your-face political about it, but without the meaningless sloganry and shopworn rhetoric that has come to dominate our political arena. Grafitti's statement is made by its very existence. Legitimizing it would cut out its heart and soul.
5 Comments:
Clever cartoon John...
It's not about the "art?" it's about where they put it.
LOVE THIS ONE, John C.! One of your best. Fell off chair laughing.
Actually, I am impressed with most graffiti when it is true graffiti, not just lots of nasty words spray painted on walls. But I agree it must be free to be true graffiti. It does not work if it is regulated.
Ah, but Jean, suppose a tagger painted Van Gogh's Sunflowers on the wall of someone's building. They probably would be delighted. So it really is about the art. [grin]
Thanks, Lee. Understand, I'm not indiscriminate when it comes to grafitti. You're right, there's good and bad, just as there's good and bad Impressionism.
I meant... most objection is not about the art... just where they decide to put it...
You write very well.
Post a Comment
<< Home