See What You Started, Andy Warhol?
One of the things I find disquieting in the high-stakes, wild west shoot-out that is the "high-end" contemporary art scene is the rise of video as an art form. Granted, I admire the work of some video artists. Occasionally it's downright stunning. But a disproportionate amount is self-indulgent, self-important garbage. And what cultural currents, I wonder, have provoked the fascination with entrails, the less technically competent they're filmed the better? The field has the potential to be incredibly lucrative. Museums around the world are snapping up videos for their permanent collections, and anyone with the marketing savvy to make a name for him or herself can sell fifteen-mintes of guts poorly photographed and badly edited, if edited at all, for thousands of bucks a pop. Of course, one must realize that museums don't have to be repositories of the best art being produced at any given period, they just have to be representative of what was going on. In an age in which many artists are the product of ineffective potty-training, it's appropriate for collections to be top-heavy with crap.
4 Comments:
John, The first time I saw videos in a museum was about 20 years ago in Rotterdam and they dedicated a whole gallery to it. I thought it was all poorly done and still can't understand why they were showing it. I was not aware that museums in the US and do it too.
Katherine
How ridiculous! But then... I reckon even digital art is pushing the biscuit. St Francis of Assisi said "he who works with his head his hand and his heart is an artist"... so does this stuff really qualify? Maybe these "artists" are using their heads hands and hearts... but one would have to wonder where their head is at... not to mention their hand. As for their heart... it scares me to see what's inside some of them.
If I were Jeremy's mom I would not discourage him. By the time he grows up his painting skills might be worth eight or ten figures ... that is if he's lucky enough to find his generation's Leo Castelli and the right critic to explain his genius to an ignorant public. As the art world seems to be almost all about hype and very little about art, no reason not to believe that in the future the quality of hype will get even better and better. Upward and onward, Jeremy!
Jeremy may get some agents or critiques to promote his work. I have seen many wonderful artists not sell because they don't know how to promote their work and others sell poorly done work very well. As I recall Andy Warhol did not sell until a gallery on the west coast bought all of his "soup cans" and promoted them.
Off the subject, but it came to me that in that Rotterdam Museum I saw halogen light bulbs used for the first time and they very proudly advertised that it was the only type of light they used and that it was the best light to show the true colors in paintings.
When I came home I bought a halogen light for my easel and loved it. There was a problem with the bulb getting VERY hot to the point it could burn you. I don't use it in my home studio and wonder if the bulbs still get so HOT. Does anyone use them?
Katherine
Post a Comment
<< Home